No institution is coming to do this for us. Historians will not interview your grandmother. A university will not sit with your neighbour's father before he passes. That knowledge belongs to ordinary families, workplaces and communities — which means its survival depends on ordinary people. Every role is open, and we would rather hear from you than not.
Open roles
Every role below is open, and none of them is capped. We would rather hear from one person who is genuinely right for this than fill a quota — so if something here fits you, say so, even if you are not certain.
01
Interviewer
Sits with a contributor, works through the eight questions in the protocol, and does not rush them. The single most important role in the project: everything downstream is only as good as the conversation.
Roughly two hours per record, including the arranging and the follow-up.
Comfortable with long silences and with people who wander off the question.
Willing to stop the moment someone hesitates about consent.
02
Writer & archivist
Turns each recording into a readable Wisdom Note without changing what was meant, then files it so it can still be found in fifty years. Transcription and translation only — never interpretation.
Roughly two hours per record.
Fastidious about not improving on what someone actually said.
Happy to be pedantic about file names, formats and dates.
03
Translator
Carries a record into another language, and marks plainly what does not translate cleanly. A lesson that survives in only one language reaches only the people who already speak it.
Fluent enough in both languages to hear tone, not only meaning.
Willing to leave a word untranslated with a note, rather than approximate it.
Roughly two hours per record.
04
Researcher
Checks what can be checked — a date, a place, a public record — and is honest in writing about what cannot. This is what decides whether a record is labelled Documented or Contributor's Account.
Comfortable concluding “this could not be verified” and leaving it there.
Keeps a note of what was checked and where, so the next person can retrace it.
An hour or two per record, often less.
05
Photographer
Makes one good photograph of a person, a place, or the thing they made. A portrait gives the voice a face; a workbench gives the lesson somewhere it came from.
A camera you know well — a phone counts.
Asks before photographing anything, every time.
Usually a single visit.
06
Technologist
Keeps the archive readable in fifty years — which is mostly a question of formats, backups and discipline rather than clever code.
Opinions about file formats that you can defend.
Prefers boring, well-documented choices over interesting ones.
Occasional work rather than weekly.
07
Community organiser
Finds the people whose knowledge would otherwise never reach us — the ones who would never think to volunteer a story about themselves.
Knows a community well enough to be trusted inside it.
Comfortable explaining consent in plain language, more than once.
As much or as little time as you have.
What we ask
01 None of these roles require credentials. They require patience, curiosity, and enough respect for another person's story to get it right.
02 New volunteers begin with guidance and light review; independence is earned through reliable work — because accuracy matters exactly as much as good intentions.
03 Consent is not a checkbox. If someone hesitates, you stop.
04 You will encounter things you are not sure how to handle. Say so rather than deciding alone.
05 Do not ask whether you are important enough to help. Ask whose wisdom you can save.
One volunteer. One contributor. One beginning.
“I will help preserve at least one meaningful experience, from one person.”
That is the entire founding commitment. Nothing more is required to start, and almost nothing is easier to keep.
The Narvyaka Pledge
I will not let valuable wisdom disappear without an attempt to preserve it.
I recognise human experience as a shared inheritance.
I will listen before I judge.
I will preserve meaning without deliberately distorting it.
I will respect consent, privacy, and human dignity.
I will value experienced people whether or not they are famous.
I will identify at least one person whose knowledge deserves to survive.
I will help carry useful wisdom forward.
Apply
Applications are read personally — there is no automated stage and no scoring — and everyone who applies gets a reply.
How we reply. Not published, not shared.
There is no correct answer here. We are reading for judgement, not for the right words.
Saved in this browser
👋Welcome to NARVYAKA
Because No Generation Should Start From Zero.
How can I help you today?
About NARVYAKA
Narvyaka is a movement to preserve at least one meaningful lesson from every willing experienced person — the judgement earned through decades of living, not facts already written down.
There's no public sign-up. Reading the archive needs no account at all. Volunteer and admin accounts are created only after an application is reviewed and approved — see "Become a Volunteer".
Preserve one meaningful lesson in under an hour: your voice, a short written note, and a photograph if you want one. Nothing is published without your review.
Every role is open — interviewing, writing and archiving, translating, research, photography, keeping the archive readable, and finding the people whose knowledge would otherwise never reach us. Applications are read personally, one at a time, never scored automatically.
Photographs and audio are uploaded as part of making a Wisdom Record — there's no separate upload page. Start a record and you'll be asked for them at the right step.
Every record arrives marked "pending review." A person reads it, confirms anything unclear with the contributor, and only then does it go anywhere — at the access level the contributor chose.
Who reads my record? A person, not a filter. Can I withdraw it later? Yes, at any time, before or after publication. How is uncertain information marked? Every record carries one of three honest labels: Documented, Contributor's Account, or Family Tradition — never presented as more certain than it is.